Why Did Germany Become a Democratic Republic Essays

Why Did Germany Become a Democratic Republic Essays Why Did Germany Become a Democratic Republic Paper Why Did Germany Become a Democratic Republic Paper Essay Topic: The Republic When did Germany Become a Country The three main reasons why the evolution did not occur were because of the attitude of the people, he failure of the left to further the revolution and the success of the Whimper Republic in defending itself. In 1918 Germany was In chaos. The war was a disaster and so many people were suffering In Germany. In 1919, real Income was only 2,as of what It was In 1913, war financed by printing money and borrowing led to massive inflation and between 1913 and 1918 the mark lost 75% of its value. Major food and fuel shortages were occurring, costs out stripped wage increases, disease was rife, and thousands were dying from major flu epidemic, plus starvation for many thousands of people. Deaths from starvation and hypothermia were at 121,000 In 191 6 and an astonishing 293,000 wounded. People in Germany were furious with the situation they were in and many were discontented. But surprisingly the revolution came from above and it was Ultrasound who led the revolution. He also cleverly distanced the military from the armistice so that the stab-in-the-back myth could be manufactured. A constitutional monarchy was then created. Morale was incredibly low and on 28th October 1918 the Kiel Mutiny occurred In which the German Navy mutinied, 8 were shot dead and this dead to a general mutiny. This started the revolution from below. The US also sent a letter to Germany stating they would be more lenient if the Kaiser was to abdicate and under all of this pressure the Kaiser was finally forced to abdicate. An interim government was the set up but this was only to fill the gap between the time that the elections had be held to elect the parties into a constitutional democracy. It was at this point In which the revolution could have continued further and evolved but it didnt. One reason is the attitude of the people. The Stenciling agreement eve workers added benefits such as the 8 hour working day, full legal recognition and workers committees. This pleased the main majority of the workers. Also at the time many people were not prepared to go even further and many work content with having a constitutional democracy. Many thought that revolting further would cause havoc and many Just wanted to settle Into a new era In Germany. This Is one reason as to winy ten evolution 010 not napped Ana ten country SE I tea Into a constitutional democracy. Another reason was the failure of the left to further the revolution and take the entry into the constitutional democracy that they wanted. There was a lack of co- ordination and poor leadership from the left. For example in spring 1919 a wave of strikes occurred in the Our mines, Central Germany and Berlin. However, these protests were uncoordinated, with radical leaders desperately following rather than leading the protests. The KIP had neither strong leadership with a clear strategy nor a tightly organized party structure, as communists did in Russia. This meant that they could never strike effectively enough. Another reason the left failed was because of a jack of support. During the wave of strikes in 1919 there was a lack of support from the workers and this coupled with the poor organization and poor leadership of the KIP led to many strikes failing. Without support it is difficult to overthrow a government so another reason why the left failed was because of lack of support. So a key reason why the evolution didnt happen was because of the failings of the left wing parties. Another reason why the country didnt evolve into a constitutional democracy was because of the success of the Whimper Republic in defending itself. The Bert- Greener pact meant that the government would be supported by the armed forces and in return the government would support steps taken by the Armed Forces to preserve discipline and it would oppose any attempts at revolutionary uprising. The Whimper Republic successfully used this deal to crush the Separatist Uprising, an attack from the left. Also in 1919 in Bavaria the workers managed to break away from the control of the Reich Government and they set up an independent socialist republic but this was also crushed by the Fireworks. Also the civil war in the Our in 1920 was crushed by the Fireworks. In this incident a Red Army had been created in protest of the Kappa Putsch and about 50,000 socialist workers protested. They controlled the region so the Government sent in the Fireworks and a war between the two begun. But the Fireworks were ruthless and the uprising was easily suppressed. The Government successfully used the Bert-Greener deal to defend itself and this is another key factor as to why the country didnt evolve into a constitutional democracy because this factor coupled with the lefts ineptitude made it very difficult for any attack from the left to be successful. Overall I would say that the most important factor would be the failings of the left. This is because if they had co-ordinate and planned properly and got support behind them by rallying all the workers and supporters of the left wing then it would have been very difficult for the government to stop being overthrown and overrun. If this had occurred the left wing parties would have set up a constitutional democracy and the evolution would have occurred. But the left did not organism effectively enough and they failed in all their attempts and this is why I believe this is the most important reason.

Collective Nouns in Spanish

Collective Nouns in Spanish See in this selection how a singular noun can refer to a group of more than one person. Excerpt from news article: El Papa Francisco dejà ³ claro que su primer objetivo era estar con el pueblo. Y asà ­ fue. El vehà ­culo que llevaba al Santo Padre y a [presidenta brasileà ±a Dilma] Rousseff desde el aeropuerto hasta la ciudad avanzà ³ arropado por una multitud de gente que se acercaba a tratar de ver de cerca al  «Papa de los pobres », sin vallas de seguridad que los separase. (The bracketed description of Rousseff was added to the original for clarity here.) Source: ABC.es, a Madrid-based news site. Retrieved July 23, 2013. Suggested translation: Pope Francis made clear that his first goal was to be with the people. And so it was. The vehicle that transported the Holy Father and [Brazilian President Dilma] Rousseff from the airport toward the city proceeded while enveloped by a crowd of people who got near in order to see the pope of the poor from nearby without security barriers to separate them. Key grammatical issue: This selection shows how collective nouns - pueblo, multitud and gente - are singular in form even though they sometimes are translated as plurals. Although both pueblo and gente are translated here as people, note how in Spanish they are singular words. Pueblo is used with the singular definite article el, and the singular verbs se acercaba (from the reflexive verb acercarse) and separase (a subjunctive form of separar) go with multitud de gente. We do the same thing in English - the most common translations for multitud, crowd and multitude, are singular even though they refer to multiple people. If pueblo and gente seem confusing, its only because they arent translated here as singular terms (although in a different context pueblo could refer to a small town). Other notes on vocabulary and grammar: Personal titles in Spanish - such as doctora in la doctora Snchez (Dr. Snchez) and seà ±or in el seà ±or Robles (Mr. Robles) - are not capitalized, and it would have been acceptable here to write el papa Francisco instead of el Papa Francisco. However, it is not unusual to capitalize the titles of certain people, Catholic popes among them, out of respect. When talking about people using their titles, the definite article (such as el in el Papa Francisco or la in la doctora Snchez) is used. If you were speaking to these people using their titles, however, you would not use the article. Dejar claro is an idiom meaning to make clear. Dejar en claro means the same thing and is more frequently used. Primer is the  apocopated form of primero. Llevar is a common verb typically meaning to carry.Note the double use of the personal a after llevaba. It is used here both before Santo Padre (al  is the combined form meaning a plus el) and before Rousseff. The personal a is also used befor e the phrase in angular quotes. The preposition desde often suggests motion from a place, in this case the airport. Motion toward is indicated by hacia.While was used in the translation for clarity. There is no equivalent word used here in the original Spanish. Arropado is the past participle of arropar, which typically means to wrap. However, it would be usual in English to say that someone was wrapped by a crowd. But the image the verb conveys is one of being closely surrounded, and enveloped seemed to work fine, although other phrases might have been used as well. Acercar usually means to bring nearer. In the reflexive form, as here, it usually means to approach or to get nearer. Tratar is a common verb often meaning to try. Angular quotation marks are used in the same way as standard double quotation marks. They are more common in publications from Spain than those from Latin America. Note how the comma after pobres is placed outside the quote marks rather than inside as it would be in American English. Valla is a word for fence. The term vallas de seguridad usually refers to small, metallic, portable fencelike structures that are used to control crowds and keep people in orderly lines.